Wednesday, June 3, 2009

[Articles of Interest] Rush Limbaugh: "Toby Harnden is right"


Posted By: Toby Harnden at May 27, 2009 at 16:59:25 [General]

Thanks to my mother-in-law, commenter VinceP1974 and @JenFidel via Twitter for alerting me to the fact that Rush Limbaugh highlighted this blog post of mine about Colin Powell and Tom Ridge on his nationally-syndicated programme yesterday. 


With an estimated 13.5 million listeners a week, Limbaugh is the
most popular talk radio host in America. Here's what he said, according
to the transcript on his site:


RUSH:  Interesting piece - it's a blog -
by Toby Harnden at the UK Telegraph.  The headline of his piece here: 
"What Right Do Colin Powell and Tom Ridge Have to Lecture the
Republican Party?"  Now, these are the questions of a British blogger
who reports out of the United States.  He writes this:  "Why does
Powell now seem to think he has the right or credibility to lecture
Republicans on how their party should be run?"  He voted for Obama, and
he did so very publicly.  He saved his endorsement of Obama at a very
propitious strategic moment and did so in public after the Republican
Party had nominated a candidate supposedly ideal to somebody like
General Powell.  That would be John McCain.  "So why does Powell now
seem to think he has the right or credibility to lecture Republicans on
how their party should be run?  Just as he did not just go quietly into
the polling booth and vote for Obama, Powell is not working discreetly
behind the behind the scenes at party gatherings to press his case,"
which is what I just said.  

Where are his policy
prescriptions?  Where does he stand?  What is he doing to organize the
Republican Party, if he's now the leader of it, in opposition to this
radical extremism that is being presented to the country from the
Democrat Party?  Now, Mr. Harnden writes, "It's easy to feel some
sympathy for Powell. He was clearly marginalised during the Bush
administration."  You know, I really think there are three reasons to
explain Colin Powell.  One of them is race.  I mean, there's no way he
wasn't gonna support Obama, coming out and doing so publicly.  Also
he's angry at Bush and the Scooter Libby thing proves that.  But I
think the third element that explains Colin Powell, he went up and, you
know, he was the point man at the United Nations with the slide show
and the official presentation on Saddam's weapons of mass destruction,
and even though we haven't found any, a lot of people believe they were
there, Colin Powell no doubt feels profoundly humiliated and
embarrassed with the people he cares about most, the Washington, DC
political elites.  

I think he's on a rehab tour to get his
reputation back, and it's working.  The rest of the DC establishment
hates Bush, so it's an easy call, come out and oppose Bush, come out
and oppose the Republican Party.  We've all known that the way a
Republican ingratiates him or herself in the DC political structure is
to go on any television show in DC you can find and rip your own party,
and maybe take it a step further:  endorse the other guy.  In fact, if
the other guy happens to share race with you makes it even easier.  So
there's a lot of rehab going on here, but Toby Harnden is right.  What
right does Powell and Tom Ridge have to lecture the Republican Party,
especially when they don't put forth any particular position on
issues?  

Original Source: http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/toby_harnden/blog/2009/05/27/rush_limbaugh_toby_harnden_is_right




Powered by ScribeFire.

[Articles of Interest] Barack Hussein Obama: US "one of the largest Muslim countries in the world"

Posted By: Toby Harnden at Jun 3, 2009 at 04:14:00 [General]

It is important to note that "if you actually took the number of Muslim Americans, we'd be one of the largest Muslim countries in the world".

So says President Barack Obama. Or I should say: Barack Hussein Obama.

That's right: Barack Hussein Obama. Say it proud. Say it out loud. The middle moniker that dared not speak its name during the election campaign is now front and centre of the US president's attempt to woo the Muslim world, the theme of his visits to Riyadh on Wednesday and Cairo on Thursday.

Petrified of the potential political fallout of being branded a Muslim, Candidate Obama - a practicing Christian - never used the name "Hussein" and its use was frowned upon as a forbidden code for the nutty accusation that he was some kind of Islamic Manchurian candidate.

No more. To say Barack Hussein Obama - BHO for short - now appears to be the height of political correctness.

As I argue in this analysis for the Telegraph dead tree edition, Obama is seeking to return to a Middle East policy based on realism - buttressed by the bona fides of his own multi-cultural (including Muslim) background.

In Strasbourg two months ago, the president tried out his full name. Days later in Ankara, he was introduced to the Turkish parliament by his full name.

As ABC's Jake Tapper and Sunlen Miller astutely outline here, the Obama administration is embracing the new president's inner Muslim, as it were. Deputy national security adviser stated that Obama had "experienced Islam on three continents...growing up in Indonesia, having a Muslim father -- obviously Muslim Americans [are] a key part of Illinois and Chicago".

So that's once, twice, three times a Muslim?

Just in case the Arab world hasn't yet got this message of inbuilt tolerance, Mr Obama himself has gone a step further. In an interview with France's Canal Plus released on Tuesday evening, he suggested that the United States might be a Muslim country.

Obama said he wanted to "create a better dialogue so that the Muslim world understands more effectively how the United States but also how the West thinks about many of these difficult issues like terrorism, like democracy, to discuss the framework for what's happened in Iraq and Afghanistan and our outreach to Iran, and also how we view the prospects for peace between the Israelis and the Palestinians".

So far, so blah - President George W. Bush often expressed much the same sentiments.

But then, as is his habit , Obama turned the concept around. "Now, the flip side is I think that the United States and the West generally, we have to educate ourselves more effectively on Islam. 

"And one of the points I want to make is, is that if you actually took the number of Muslim Americans, we'd be one of the largest Muslim countries in the world.  And so there's got to be a better dialogue and a better understanding between the two peoples."

Obama said in Turkey that Americans "do not consider ourselves a Christian nation or a Jewish nation or a Muslim nation". John McCain was criticised in 2007 for saying the US was "a Christian nation", later amending this to "a Judeo-Christian valued nation".

Of course, the concept of separation of church and state, which derived from the First Amendment to the Constitution, means that the US is not officially a Christian nation or a nation of any other particular religion. Which means, I suppose, that the US is as much a Muslim nation as a Christian one.

It's a bold - some might say audacious - turnaround by the president.

It's also a classically Obamaesque move.

During the 2008 campaign, he skillfully made himself, through his life story, the personification of change.

Now, implicitly contrasting himself with the born-again, evangelical Bush who pursued a post-9/11 "crusade" against terrorism, Obama is presenting himself to the Islamic world as the personification of a new, tolerant - and, yes, partly Muslim - America.

UPDATE: The excellent Don Surber crunches the numbers and points out that Obama's claim is highly dubious. According to Surber, the US has an estimated three to eight million Muslims, less than one per cent of the world's total and less than at least 23 other countries.

The average claim for the US Muslim population is about six million. The precise figure is difficult to get because it's not included in US census data and many put the figure at much, much less.

But even if we assume there are six million Muslims in the US, that makes it only the 34th biggest Muslim country in the world - behind Indonesia, Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Turkey, Egypt, Iran, Nigeria, China, Ethiopia, Algeria, Morocco, Afghanistan, Sudan, Iraq, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Uzbekistan, Yemen, Tanzania, Syria, Malaysia, Niger, Senegal, Ghana, Tunisia, Somalia, Guinea, Kenya, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Burkina Faso and Tajikistan.

UPDATE 2: Debbie Schlussel cites a reputable survey by Pew that puts the number of Muslims in the US at 1.8 million. This would make it the 48th biggest Muslim country, after the above list plus France, Libya, Jordan, Israel, Turkmenistan, Uganda, Kyrgyzstan, Mauritania, Germany, Kuwait, Oman, Eritrea, Lebanon and Serbia and Montenegro - and just above Britain, which would be the 50th.

Original Source: http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/toby_harnden/blog/2009/06/03/barack_hussein_obama_us_one_of_the_largest_muslim_countries_in_the_world



Powered by ScribeFire.

Saturday, May 30, 2009

[Articles of Interest] Barack Obama: all the bad guys are giving President Pantywaist the finger

Posted By: Gerald Warner at May 29, 2009 at 19:41:52 [General]
Kim Jong-il, the charismatic and popular (if you are a Pyongyang resident and covet a life expectancy of more than 24 hours) Dear Leader of North Korea, is on his sixth or seventh missile this week. See the pretty vapour trails streak across Asian skies, in an impressive firework display to celebrate the arrival of President Pantywaist in the Oval Office.

School's out! Suddenly it is playtime for all the naughtier elements in the more "reclusive" parts of the world who enjoy kicking Uncle Sam's butt but didn't much relish tangling with Dick Cheney and (what was that other guy's name?). This time Comrade Kim is really throwing his toys out of the playpen. He has even unilaterally revoked the 1953 armistice between the Korean War belligerents, which means, in case anybody is interested, that North and South Korea are once more at war.

So, what is the response of the Messiah in the Oval Office? Really severe rhetoric, is the answer. The soundbite manufacturers have been burning the midnight oil and the auto-cue is going into meltdown. So is the confidence of Asian leaders. The word is out: the most powerful nation on earth has got itself a pussycat for a president and all the bad guys are queuing up to give him the finger.

It is a measure of Obama's acknowledged impotence that some of those who are now cheeking him are doing so with a degree of sophistication they had not previously exhibited. Irony and sarcasm are being deployed in an unlikely place: Tehran. It is the worst-kept secret in the world that Iran is dependent on North Korea for the development of its nuclear programme. When Kim last lit the blue touch-paper, in 2006, Tehran roundly supported him. This time the mullahs have come up with a more teasing ploy: they have righteously condemned him.

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran said piously: "We recommend all countries not to waste national resources and their people's wealth on moving toward nuclear proliferation and making weapons of mass destruction." You have to have respect for a man who can deliver a statement like that with a straight face. On Britain's Got Talent such a virtuoso performance would have knocked Susan Boyle off the radar.

President Pantywaist's enemies are taking his measure and they are liking what they see. Perhaps, in some Macchiavellian way, Obama thinks the appointment to the Supreme Court of a Latina woman of apparent bias, who seems unlikely to find in favour of a white male American, will either appease or frighten his foes. Come back, Dick Cheney, all is forgiven.

Original Story: http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/gerald_warner/blog/2009/05/29/barack_obama_all_the_bad_guys_are_giving_president_pantywaist_the_finger



Powered by ScribeFire.

[Articles of Interest] Barack Obama and the CIA: why does President Pantywaist hate America so badly?

Posted By: Gerald Warner at Apr 24, 2009 at 18:41:00 [General]

If al-Qaeda, the Taliban and the rest of the Looney Tunes brigade want to kick America to death, they had better move in quickly and grab a piece of the action before Barack Obama finishes the job himself. Never in the history of the United States has a president worked so actively against the interests of his own people - not even Jimmy Carter.

Obama's problem is that he does not know who the enemy is. To him, the enemy does not squat in caves in Waziristan, clutching automatic weapons and reciting the more militant verses from the Koran: instead, it sits around at tea parties in Kentucky quoting from the US Constitution. Obama is not at war with terrorists, but with his Republican fellow citizens. He has never abandoned the campaign trail.

That is why he opened Pandora's Box by publishing the Justice Department's legal opinions on waterboarding and other hardline interrogation techniques. He cynically subordinated the national interest to his partisan desire to embarrass the Republicans. Then he had to rush to Langley, Virginia to try to reassure a demoralised CIA that had just discovered the President of the United States was an even more formidable foe than al-Qaeda.

"Don't be discouraged by what's happened the last few weeks," he told intelligence officers. Is he kidding? Thanks to him, al-Qaeda knows the private interrogation techniques available to the US intelligence agencies and can train its operatives to withstand them - or would do so, if they had not already been outlawed.

So, next time a senior al-Qaeda hood is captured, all the CIA can do is ask him nicely if he would care to reveal when a major population centre is due to be hit by a terror spectacular, or which American city is about to be irradiated by a dirty bomb. Your view of this situation will be dictated by one simple criterion: whether or not you watched the people jumping from the twin towers.

Obama promised his CIA audience that nobody would be prosecuted for past actions. That has already been contradicted by leftist groups with a revanchist ambition to put Republicans, headed if possible by Condoleezza Rice, in the dock. Talk about playing party politics with national security. Martin Scheinin, the United Nations special investigator for human rights, claims that senior figures, including former vice president Dick Cheney, could face prosecution overseas. Ponder that - once you have got over the difficulty of locating the United Nations and human rights within the same dimension.

President Pantywaist Obama should have thought twice before sitting down to play poker with Dick Cheney. The former vice president believes documents have been selectively published and that releasing more will prove how effective the interrogation techniques were. Under Dubya's administration, there was no further atrocity on American soil after 9/11.

President Pantywaist's recent world tour, cosying up to all the bad guys, excited the ambitions of America's enemies. Here, they realised, is a sucker they can really take to the cleaners. His only enemies are fellow Americans. Which prompts the question: why does President Pantywaist hate America so badly?


Original Story: http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/gerald_warner/blog/2009/04/24/barack_obama_and_the_cia_why_does_president_pantywaist_hate_America_so_badly



Powered by ScribeFire.

[Articles of Interest] Socialist Morals: Huntsman cautioned for chasing hare under Hunting Act

A
huntsman has been given a police caution for illegally hunting a hare –
the first case of its kind dealt with under the controversial Hunting
Act.




 






Hare. UK: Huntsman cautioned for chasing hare in first case of its kind under Hunting Act

Nigel Bell was filmed chasing a hare by anti-hunt monitors in February this year and has been given a police caution
Photo: GETTY



Nigel Bell, 53, from the Wick and District Beagles, admitted the
breach after he was filmed chasing the animal by anti-hunt monitors in
February this year.

It is the first time anti-hunt campaigners
have successfully brought a case against a hare hunt under the Act
which was introduced in 2004, the League Against Cruel Sports (LACS)
claimed.


Avon and Somerset Police confirmed Bell was cautioned on April 29 at
Thornbury police station in connection with the incident on land
between Horton and Badminton, in South Gloucestershire.

A
spokeswoman for LACS said: "Although a caution may seem like he has
been let off, it is actually a very helpful step forward in our fight
against illegal hunters.

"What this demonstrates is that the
Hunting Act is clear and enforceable and, furthermore, hunters know
this to be the case. It is also apparent that the police are aware of
what the law entails.

"This latest victory has been the result of
the dedication and commitment of League monitors, and under caution it
will be very difficult for Mr Bell to get off lightly on any further
breaches of the Act.

"In light of the fact there currently exists
more than 100 beagle packs, the incident involving Mr Bell will compel
huntsmen next season to adhere to the law."

The Wick and District
Beagles is a relatively small hunting pack that follows beagle hounds
on foot and, pre-ban, traditionally hunted hares rather than foxes or
deer.

Based in South Gloucestershire, outside Bristol, it is
well-known for bringing beagles to various country shows around the
region.

A spokesman for Avon and Somerset Police said: "We have
investigated a couple of allegations of hunting wild animals with dogs,
initially reported in January this year in Horton.

"In connection with that incident, a 53-year-old man was given an adult caution on April 29 at Thornbury police station."


Original Story: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/lawandorder/5291266/Huntsman-cautioned-for-chasing-hare-in-first-case-of-its-kind-under-Hunting-Act.html



Powered by ScribeFire.

[Articles of Interest] Socialist Morals: the PETA Baby Murder contradiction.

Otis Ferry: 'They put me in jail for my beliefs' --- In his first interview since his release, Otis Ferry - the 26-year-old son of Roxy Music star Bryan Ferry - says he was held in prison for four months merely because he supports fox hunting
(What I find ironic is PETA's position on animal right, while supporting baby murder {aka abortion or termination})

By Andrew Alderson
Last Updated: 10:56PM BST 30 May 2009

1 of 4 Images
Otis Ferry with his hunt hounds in Shropshire
Otis Ferry with his hunt hounds in Shropshire: 'I have always been fascinated by the countryside. I love animals more than people.' Photo: Geoff Pugh

OTIS Ferry is back where he is at his happiest: in the countryside surrounded by his five horses, his 60 hunting hounds and his three pet dogs. For the first time since the end of 2007, the man who says he prefers animals to people can relax in the knowledge that he does not have the threat of a lengthy prison sentence hanging over him.

Yet the eldest son of rock star Bryan Ferry and former model Lucy Helmore (now Birley) is in no mood for celebrating. "I don't feel like I have won the Olympic 100 metres title – more like I have survived a two-year marathon," he says.

The dismay of Prisoner RB7994 is not, however, directed at his fellow inmates, most of whom he says he liked, but at the police and Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) which he claims targeted him unfairly. "This has been politically motivated. I am a Tory-supporting master of foxhounds, and the current Government is anti everything that someone like me stands for. This is a socialist Government and I am the epitome of everything they detest.

"The police and Crown Prosecution Service were baying to screw me over as hard as they could. The Gloucestershire constabulary are notorious celebrity-hunters – not that I consider myself a 'celebrity'. I hate the word. The pressure from the Crown Prosecution was not normal. They put an enormous amount of effort and money into a bog-standard case."

It is not just Ferry and his supporters who think he was hard done by. Even the judge who had presided over his case after Ferry was accused of perverting the course of justice could not hide his anger at the defendant's treatment when the charge was dropped.

Ferry is no stranger to controversy, and has been arrested at least five times for his pro-countryside and hunting protests. In 2002, he was seized at 4am as he approached Tony Blair's constituency home "armed" with pro-hunting posters. Two years later, he led a famous assault on the House of Commons chamber when he and seven other pro-hunting protesters disrupted the parliamentary debate.

His latest woes began on November 21 2007 when he had been due to ride out with the South Shropshire Hunt, of which he is joint hunt master. Because his hounds were ill, Ferry called off his own hunt and, along with his girlfriend, Francesca Nimmo, and another huntsman drove to nearby Gloucestershire to ride out with the Heythrop Hunt.

However, he arrived late and was struggling to find the main group when he came across an incident in which a pro-hunt supporter clashed with two hunt monitors – widely known as "antis" or saboteurs to the hunting community.

What exactly happened next is disputed, but Ferry admits that he instinctively went to the aid of the pro-hunt supporter in his scuffle with two women who were seeking to gather evidence of a breach of the Hunting Act 2004.

Ferry, who is dressed in a check shirt and dark blue jeans, admits the hunt supporter had "lost the plot", verbally abusing the hunt monitors, before rocking their car and smashing a window. "I saw the video camera drop to the ground. I thought: 'I had better help this guy out.' I jumped off my horse, ran to the side of the car, picked up the camera and jumped on my horse again. Then I galloped up the road as quickly as I could with the camera gripped in my mouth because my hands were on the reins. I got 200 yards up the road and there was a police car. So I chucked the camera into the verge, opened the gate to a field, and rode off."

One of the hunt monitors claimed, however, that Ferry tried to grab the video camera from her and had won a "tug of war" for her car keys, leaving her upper right arm slightly bruised.

Ferry denies the tussle, but admits he later returned to recover the camera, wiped clear the film, and gave it to a member of the hunt so the camera could be returned to its owner.

Two days later, Ferry was asked to attend Shrewsbury police station after an officer said they had found his lost Jack Russell puppy, Tiny. Yet when he arrived, he was arrested in connection with the Gloucestershire incident, and put in a police cell. Ferry was angry: "Of all the tricks to play. If they had wanted to question or arrest me, all they needed to do was ring me up."

Ferry was taken by police car to Gloucester police station, where he was interviewed and, later, released. In April last year, Ferry was charged with robbery and common assault and a trial date was set for September. Matters then escalated from bad to worse for Ferry, the eldest of four brothers, who was educated at Marlborough College before leaving school after passing 11 GCSEs.

Ferry says he received a mobile message from an anonymous texter just days before the trial, saying that he or she was going to be interviewed by the police. Ferry says he rang the number out of curiosity and found himself speaking to his former groom, David Hodgkiss. He says he was puzzled that Hodgkiss had contacted him, but was unperturbed, especially as the groom had not witnessed the dispute. However, when the police turned up to take the statement, Hodgkiss told them he had been warned by Ferry not to give evidence against him.

Days later, on the first morning of Ferry's robbery and assault trial, Hodgkiss's statement was revealed to the court. The hearing was adjourned until the next day when Ferry was again arrested, this time on suspicion of perverting the course of justice through "witness nobbling". He was interviewed at Stroud police station and, at the insistence of the CPS, refused bail and detained overnight in a police cell. The next day in court, the prosecution lawyer again opposed bail on the grounds that Ferry might re-offend. Judge Martin Picton remanded Ferry in custody, which meant he had to go to Gloucester prison, a Category B institution that houses murders, rapists and violent criminals.

"This really sent a shiver down my spine," says Ferry. "I was handcuffed and booked into this prison with 400 other people. I was absolutely petrified because I had no idea what I might be up against."

Initially, he thought he would be in his single cell for just a night. But the jail was to become his home for the next four months.

In his 12ft-by-7ft cell, he had a bed, sink, lavatory and colour television. "The first week was a blur. I just could not believe that this was happening to me."

His worst moments were changing from his prison uniform – a grey tracksuit – into his suit to go to court expecting to be released on bail, only to be returned to jail: "Going to court to be denied bail is one of the most crushing experiences anyone will ever experience. It happened to me four times and was completely soul-destroying."

After a week in jail, his first visitors were his girlfriend and mother. It was an emotional experience for everyone. "For me, the tears were not about my predicament but how embarrassing it was to be seen in that state: reduced to wearing prison uniform, anchored to a table wearing a prison bib. I felt particularly for my mum, seeing her son totally defensive and helpless. Every part of you is stripped and you become a number, a nothing."

Ferry spent his 26th birthday and Christmas in prison, though he was grateful on Christmas Eve to have a visit from his
63-year-old father, the former lead singer of Roxy Music, whose hits include Dance Away, Avalon and Jealous Guy. "Dad was a bit tougher about it all than mum. I was very touched that he came. I didn't think he would – not out of disloyalty, but because it's a demeaning place to have to come and see your son. If you are in the public eye, you are very image conscious, quite rightly. But I was delighted to see him."

Typically, Ferry spent more than 20 hours a day alone in his cell, reading and writing letters (he had more than 400 from
well-wishers to reply to). Every other evening, one half of the prison block had "association", during which prisoners had the chance to play table tennis or pool. "I have never played with such a bunch of cheats – they were worse than my brothers," he jokes.

Ferry liked most of the "screws" – the prison officers – but complained some were "chippy, unhelpful and lazy". While he was never attacked or threatened, he admits that he benefited from having "Trevor" as his "next-door neighbour". "He was the most feared man in the prison – a black guy, aged about 40, on remand for attempted robbery. He was a colourful character but was very nice to me and a nice person. I got on well with him. Prisons are full of people who have simply made a bad decision at some point in their lives. There was a great feeling of camaraderie. Unless you are a child molester, everyone is seen as an equal."

Ferry found that most prisoners were pro-hunting. "I hope I did a good PR job for the hunting community – and public schoolboys." He says that fellow prisoners offered him drugs – there was an abundance of cannabis and heroin in the jail. It was an offer he found easy to decline.

In January, after four months in jail, Ferry's lawyers persuaded the judge to released him on bail subject to a £25,000 surety, a pledge to live with his mother in west London, and Ferry reporting to the police twice a week. Two months later, the prosecution indicated in court that it was unhappy with witness "inconsistencies" relating to the perverting the course of justice charge against Ferry. This incensed Judge Martin Picton, who described Ferry's custody as "nonsensical and farcical".

Finally, nine days ago, the Crown accepted Ferry's pleas of not guilty to robbery and common assault charges. He admitted a public order offence and was given a one-year conditional discharge for causing "fear, stress and upset" to one of the hunt monitors. He was also fined £350 with £100 costs. Today, he concedes he was responsible for an "error of judgement" and regrets getting involved in the dispute.

Gloucestershire police and the CPS deny targeting Ferry unfairly. "He was treated the same as any other member of the public," says a spokesman. "The decision to investigate alleged offences was made by professional, seasoned officers."

A spokesman for the CPS says: "Mr Ferry's case was kept under review and dealt with according to the Code for Crown Prosecutors, in the same way as every other case that the CPS deals with."

Although Bryan Ferry is worth millions, his eldest son lives a modest existence. Unpaid for his role as hunt master, Otis
lives alone in a two-bedroom cottage, occasionally selling horses, modelling and writing for a living. He drives an ageing green Mercedes estate, and his parents help him out by paying the odd bill.

Ferry is unclear about his future but remains committed to country pursuits. "I love animals more than people," he says. "I have always been fascinated by the countryside." He admires foxes but says hunting is important for conservation, as it picks off the weakest, oldest animals, unlike shooting, which can kill a fox in its prime.

He says the countryside feels "betrayed, victimised and cheated" by the Government, and, as a Conservative supporter, he is now tempted to pursue a career in politics.

"Hunting is like religion in the countryside. I don't think there is anything I could enjoy more than running my hounds and the hunt. The question I now have to answer is whether I feel I have an obligation to other people to try to safeguard rural traditions."


Original Story: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/5412582/Otis-Ferry-They-put-me-in-jail-for-my-beliefs.html



Powered by ScribeFire.

[Articles of Interest] Socialist Morals

We're in a state of sexual confusion! -- The line has blurred between information and tacit encouragement, argues Jenny McCartney.

Jenny McCartney

Last Updated: 3:41PM GMT 28 Mar 2009


Since this Government came to power, one of its most frequently and
piously declared goals has been to reduce the number of teenage
pregnancies.
It has thus poured more than £280 million of taxpayers'
money into contraception services and sex education in the last decade,
not least because it calculates that teenage mothers tend to cost the
state even more after they give birth
.

The latest dismal figures,
however, showed the rate of pregnancy among under-16s at its highest
for 10 years
. The Government responded by vowing a further £20 million
to policies which include long-term contraceptive injections and
implants for teenagers.
It was also suggested last week that abortion
clinics should be allowed to advertise on television
and advertisements
for condoms be routinely screened before the nine o'clock watershed
.
Apart from the inherent distastefulness of such initiatives, there is
little likelihood that they will work
. The Government has taken on the
aspect of a dead-eyed Las Vegas gambler, slumped at the roulette wheel,
throwing good money and principles after bad.


It has been confusedly reported that the suggestion to televise
advertisements for abortion clinics is an effort to "curb teenage
pregnancies". This is not true, since an abortion clinic can only be of
interest when pregnancy has already occurred. It is in fact an effort
to curb live births to teenage mothers.

There is a grotesque and
widening gulf in how society depicts pregnancy in mothers of different
ages and classes
. The pregnancy of an older, middle-class mother – a
triumph over the dreaded spectre of infertility – or a wealthy
celebrity is increasingly viewed by the media as a miraculous event
:
the world is beckoned in to relish vicariously everything from the
first perceptible flutterings of foetal limbs to the gloriously
expanding size of the bump.

If a 14-year-old girl should fall
pregnant, however, sentimental cooing is replaced by cold
functionality
. The official line from the top down is: quick, get the
damn thing "sorted out". If she agrees, the bemused girl is rushed to
the nearest clinic for a termination
(the socialist term for murder), after which she is generally
supposed to shut up about it and hug her shameful little secret close
.
Some girls may bounce back from such an experience with relative
insouciance, others may find that it haunts them psychologically ever
after. Responses to abortion are deep-rooted, complicated and rarely
discussed in public: it's the sorrowful, silent side of sex.

I am
not opposed to the provision of abortion services, sex education or
contraception. I am, however, opposed to the persistent trivialising of
both abortion and sex, particularly with regard to adolescents. The
Government's policy of constant nagging about contraception has not
solved the problem of teenage conception at all: it has made it worse.
The line has been blurred between information and tacit encouragement.

Imagine
that you are a 14-year-old British girl, growing up in a society
saturated in the notion that women should do whatever it takes to make
themselves attractive to men. You acquire a 15-year-old boyfriend whom
you're eager to keep, and he starts pressuring you to have sex. You
feel uneasy, yet sex is precisely what society seems to expect of you.
For years, you've been bombarded with detail on sex, contraception, and
the morning-after pill, and repeatedly informed that there's no need to
feel guilty so long as you're "responsible". You know this, and your
boyfriend does too. But the bottom line is that if you should end up
pregnant, suddenly the easy-going quasi-approval stops: you're still
dumped on your own in a lonely place, outside the abortion clinic or
the antenatal ward.

It's time we stopped telling teenagers lies,
that sex is inherently carefree, contraception infallible, abortion a
casual technical procedure. Yet these are precisely the myths that the
Government's escalating strategy seems designed to promote, at the same
time as effectively dangling early motherhood as a state-subsidised
career option to those with few other prospects. On current form, no
one should be surprised if, 10 years hence, our politicians are still
poring over the teenage pregnancy statistics and wondering where it all
went wrong.


original story: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/jennymccartney/5066636/Were-in-a-state-of-sexual-confusion.html




Powered by ScribeFire.

[Articles of Interest] Obama & His Socialist Friends Murder Babies

US student becomes anti-abortion star for clandestine filming A student who visits abortion clinics with a hidden video camera has become a rising star in the anti-abortion movement in the US.
Murder of innocent babies in the name of social progress!
Lila Rose: US student becomes anti-abortion star for clandestine filming
Lila Rose, a 20-year-old history major at the University of California Photo: REUTERS

As part of the project to shine a light on what she claims is the taxpayer-subsidised organisation's cover-up of sexual abuse, Lila Rose has posed as a teenage girl to visit Planned Parenthood clinics, the country's largest provider of surgical abortions.

She claims Planned Parenthood counsellors routinely ignore their duty to report statutory rape when dealing with young girls impregnated by older men and often tell them to lie about their age or the identity of their sex partners rather than alert authorities.

Walking into two Los Angeles area Planned Parenthood clinics with a hidden video camera in March 2007, Miss Rose, then 18, told the staff she was 15 and had been impregnated by her 23-year-old boyfriend.

She said the workers at the first centre encouraged her to lie about her age so that they would not have to report statutory rape. At the second centre, she says, counsellors aggressively pushed her to have an abortion.

Since then, she has conducted stings at six other clinics.

A 20-year-old history major at University of California, Los Angeles, she has posted the tapes on the website of her nonprofit group, LiveAction.org, prompting authorities in three states to launch investigations into Planned Parenthood.

"Planned Parenthood is looking at these young girls as a plumbing problem: 'We'll get you that abortion and send you on your way,'" Miss Rose said. "And that's disrespecting two human lives. It's destroying her pre-born child and sending her back to an abuser."

Her activities have won her support from conservatives, anti-abortion activists and some child abuse experts and umbrage from abortion rights supporters.

Planned Parenthood clinics have posted her picture to alert workers.

A spokesman for Planned Parenthood declined to discuss the specific cases involving Miss Rose but said the organisation has strict policies and procedures regarding mandatory reporting and takes seriously laws protecting minors.

"In rare instances where health centre employees violate those policies, immediate corrective action is taken," he said.

Thirty-six years after the US Supreme Court's ruling in the landmark Roe v. Wade case that termination of pregnancy was legal, abortion is still a bitterly debated social and political issue in the United States.

A Gallup poll conducted earlier this month showed 51 per cent of Americans identified themselves as "pro-life."


original story: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/5403432/US-student-becomes-anti-abortion-star-for-clandestine-filming.html



Powered by ScribeFire.

US troops could stay in Iraq for a decade

The Pentagon is prepared for US forces to remain in Iraq for as long as a decade despite an agreement between Washington and Baghdad that would bring all US troops home by 2012, according to the army chief of staff.
 
U.S soldier in central Baghdad, Iraq: US Army prepared to stay in Iraq for a decade
The US currently has about 139,000 troops in Iraq and 52,000 in Afghanistan Photo: HEATHCLIFF O'MALLEY

With the world remaining "dangerous and unpredictable", Gen George Casey said that the Pentagon should plan for extended US combat and security operations deploying up to 50,000 personnel in Iraq and Afghanistan for a period much longer than currently envisaged.

"Global trends are pushing in the wrong direction," said Gen Casey.

"They fundamentally will change how the army works."

Emphasising that he was not a policy maker, he said did not want to contradict the Obama administration's policy but to prepare the army for the possibility of long deployments.

President Barack Obama wants to bring US combat forces home from Iraq in 2010.

The US and Iraq have agreed that all American forces would leave by 2012.

Although several senior US officials have suggested Iraq could request an extension, the legal agreement the two countries signed last year would have to be amended for any significant presence to remain.

The US currently has about 139,000 troops in Iraq and 52,000 in Afghanistan, with a further 16,000 to arrive by the end of this year.

Gen Casey said his could foresee ten combat brigades plus command and support forces committed to the two wars. Brigades tend to number 3,000 to 5,000.

His calculations about force levels were related to his attempt to ease the brutal deployment calendar that he said would "bring the army to its knees".

His goal was, he explained, to move rotations by 2011 to one year in the battlefield and two years out for regular army troops, and one year in the battlefield and three years out for reserves. He called the current one-year-in, one-year-out cycle "unsustainable".

He also said the US had to be careful about what assets are deployed to Afghanistan. "Anything you put in there would be in there for a decade," he said.

The general's duties include main responsibility for assembling the manpower and determining assignments. He insisted the army's size of 1.1 million was sufficient even to handle the extended Mideast conflicts.



Powered by ScribeFire.

Tuesday, May 12, 2009

[Articles of Interest] From the Annals of Global Socialism

Rich May Be Australian Budget Target Amid Recession (Update1)

By Gemma Daley

May 12 (Bloomberg) -- Australian Treasurer Wayne Swan will tonight unveil a Robin Hood-style budget, slashing tax breaks and welfare-payments to high-income earners as he tries to contain a record deficit amid the global recession.

Swan will take away subsidies for the rich while protecting payments to lower-income earners, the aged and the unemployed in the budget, framed amid an economic slump that has cut tax revenue by more than A$200 billion ($153 billion), economists say. He releases the budget at 7:30 p.m. in Canberra.

The Labor government (The Socialists) of Prime Minister Kevin Rudd will unveil a A$34 billion deficit in the year ending June 30, the first shortfall in seven years, as tax revenue from a commodities export boom dries up, according to the median of 16 economists surveyed by Bloomberg. Swan warned today there “will be tough decisions,” as he tries to limit debt in a budget the treasury department says won’t return to surplus until 2015-16.

Swan will rob rich Peter to pay poor Paul,” said Stephen Walters, chief economist at JPMorgan Chase & Co. in Sydney. “The rivers of gold from the commodities boom flowing through the economy are well and truly over.”

The economists’ survey predicts Swan will also forecast budget deficits of A$58.5 billion in 2009-10 and A$60 billion in 2010-11. The economy will contract 0.3 percent in 2009-10, they forecast.

Treasury has said the government will have to borrow as much as A$200 billion through the bond market to fund deficits until 2015-16.

Tax Breaks

Swan has already signaled he will halve tax breaks for high-income earners contributing to pension funds and slash their government subsidy for private health insurance. At the same time, he’ll deliver extra help for families earning less than A$150,000 a year and increase payments to aged pensioners.

Still, income-tax cuts for people earning between A$80,000 and A$180,000 scheduled for the two years starting July 1 will go ahead. The cuts were part of A$23 billion in cuts announced in last year’s budget.

“Everybody in Australia has to do their bit and some people have the capacity to do a bit more,” Swan told reporters in Canberra today.

Swan’s imposts on high-income earners mirrors steps in the U.S. and the U.K.

Obama Budget

In the U.S., President Barack Obama has proposed raising income-tax rates to help narrow a record budget shortfall and pay for a planned overhaul of health care. Obama’s budget, which must be enacted by Congress before taking effect, would reinstate the top two Clinton-era tax rates of 36 percent and 39.6 percent, up from the 33 percent and 35 percent the richest Americans now pay.

That would affect about 2.6 million taxpayers, starting with singles with taxable income of $164,550 and married couples with taxable income of $200,300.

U.K. Chancellor of the Exchequer Alistair Darling this month raised taxes on the top income earners to help pay for the government efforts to stimulate the economy.

Australian is in its first recession since 1991 as the international slowdown crimps demand for exports from the world’s biggest shipper of coal and iron ore. Gross domestic product will shrink 1.25 percent in the year ending June 30 and unemployment will rise, the central bank said last week.

Cash Handouts

That means the government will receive lower tax payments from the labor market and from companies including miner BHP Billiton Ltd., which is firing 6,000 workers as the global recession curbs demand for minerals. The nation’s biggest airline, Qantas Airways Ltd., will also pay less tax as it forecasts a record loss in the six months ended June 30, which has prompted it to cut 5 percent of its staff.

Swan’s deficit woes have been compounded by government stimulus packages over the past eight months.

The government since September has pledged an extra A$130 billion on cash handouts to low and middle-income earners, infrastructure spending, funding for a national broadband network and bond-market assistance. In the same period, the Reserve Bank of Australia cut its benchmark interest rate to a 49-year low of 3 percent to revive growth.

“The fiscal boost to the economy from earlier policy announcements is already massive, yet the budget will deliver even more largesse,” Walters said. “The fiscal pulse is equivalent to around 7 percent of GDP.”

Pension Increase

Swan has said the budget may include a A$30 a week increase in the aged pension, which would cost A$5 billion a year.

He will introduce government-paid parental leave, costing A$260 million per year, for people earning below A$150,000. New mothers who leave the workforce would receive the average weekly wage of A$544 a week for 18 weeks, starting in January 2011.

The budget may also spend extra on ports, roads and rail, and increase benefits to the unemployed. Grants to first-home buyers, which were raised to as much as A$21,000 from A$7,000 in October, may be reduced.

With lower income and demand, the government has reined in public service spending to limit the deficit. It may also raise taxes on alcohol and tobacco.

Economists forecast the 2009-10 budget deficit will be 4.9 percent of GDP, the largest since 1970, when Treasury forecasts were first provided. The U.K budget deficit will be 12.4 percent of GDP this year and the U.S. deficit is forecast to be 12 percent, according to the Congressional Office’s analysis.

Election Looms

The Labor government, which won power in 2007, faces an election by the end of 2010. Prime Minister Rudd may call an early vote if the upper house Senate, which he doesn’t control, refuses to pass all the budget measures.

Any refusal by the upper house to pass budget measures would leave the case for an early election “wide open,” Australian National University analyst Lindy Edwards said yesterday. “There would be a strategic advantage to go early because the government has been frustrated by the Senate already.”

To contact the reporter on this story: Gemma Daley in Canberra at gdaley@bloomberg.net

Last Updated: May 11, 2009 19:38 EDT



Powered by ScribeFire.

Wednesday, May 6, 2009

[Articles of Interest] British Socialist Pigs

Britain's 'least wanted' blacklist published

Britain's 'least wanted' blacklist published AFP/File – Lebanese militant Samir Kantar attends a ceremony in Tehran in January 2009. The government published …

LONDON (AFP) – The government published a blacklist Tuesday of people recently banned from the country including a Hamas lawmaker and a Jewish extremist, as well as anti-gay protestors and a far-right US talk show host.

Home Secretary Jacqui Smith said she decided to publish the "name and shame" list -- which identifies 16 people banned since last October -- for the first time to clarify what behaviour Britain will not tolerate.

"I think it's important that people understand the sorts of values and sorts of standards that we have here, the fact that it's a privilege to come and the sort of things that mean you won't be welcome in this country," she said.

"If you can't live by the rules that we live by ... we should exclude you from this country and, what's more, now we will make public those people that we have excluded," she told the GMTV broadcaster.

Between October and April the Home Office excluded 22 people for "fostering extremism or hatred" included preachers Abdullah Qadri Al Ahdal and Amir Siddique, said a Home Office statement.

Hamas lawmaker Yunis Al-Astal, Jewish extremist Mike Guzovsky, former Ku Klux Klan leader Stephen Donald Black and neo-Nazi Erich Gliebe are also on the list, as is controversial radio host Michael Alan Weiner, also known as Michael Savage.

They also included Samir Kantar, who was released by Israel last July in a prisoner swap with Hezbollah.

Described as a monster in Israel where he was convicted for killing Danny Haran, his four-year-old daughter Einat and an Israeli policeman in a notorious attack nearly three decades ago, Kantar is considered a hero by many in Lebanon, where he was given a red carpet welcome on his release.

He carried out the cross-border raid that landed him in jail in 1979 when he was part of the Palestine Liberation Front. Since his release he has become the darling of Hezbollah and speaks at many of their events.

Others blacklisted include homophobic US pastor Fred Waldron Phelps, as well as Artur Ryno and Pavel Skachevsky, former leaders of a violent Russian skinhead gang which committed 20 racially motivated murders.

Smith said: "The government opposes extremism in all its forms and I am determined to stop those who want to spread extremism, hatred and violent messages in our communities from coming to our country.

"This is the driving force behind tighter rules on exclusions for unacceptable behaviour," she added.

Six of those excluded recently were not named because it would not be "in the public interest," said the Home Office.

In February Britain triggered a formal protest from the Netherlands after refusing entry to far-right Dutch lawmaker Geert Wilders, maker of a controversial film linking Islam to terrorist attacks.





Powered by ScribeFire.

[Articles of Interest] Socialist Pigs (Animal Farm) in Congress

Senate Democrats Deny Specter Committee Seniority

By Paul Kane (Washington Post)
The Senate dealt a blow tonight to Sen. Arlen Specter's hold on seniority in several key committees, a week after the Pennsylvanian's party switch placed Democrats on the precipice of a 60-seat majority.

In a unanimous voice vote, the Senate approved a resolution that added Specter to the Democratic side of the dais on the five committees on which he serves, an expected move that gives Democrats larger margins on key panels such as Judiciary and Appropriations.

But Democrats placed Specter in one of the two most junior slots on each of the five committees for the remainder of this Congress, which goes through December 2010. Democrats have suggested that they will consider revisiting Specter's seniority claim at the committee level only after the midterm elections next year.

"This is all going to be negotiated next Congress," Jim Manley, spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.), said tonight.

Specter's office declined to comment.

Without any assurance of seniority, Specter loses a major weapon in his campaign to win reelection in 2010: the ability to claim that his nearly 30 years of Senate service places him in key positions to benefit his constituents.

Tonight's committee resolution, quickly read on the Senate floor by Reid himself, contradicts Specter's assertion last Tuesday when he publicly announced his move from the Republican side of the aisle. He told reporters that he retained his seniority both in the overall chamber and in the committees on which he serves. Specter said that becoming chairman of the Appropriations Committee was a personal goal of his, one that would be within reach if he were granted his seniority on the panel and placed as the third-most senior Democrat there.

Specter, if granted seniority, would also be next in line to chair the Judiciary Committee behind the current chairman, Sen. Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.).

Without that seniority, though, Specter, 79, would not even hold an appropriations subcommittee chairmanship in 2011, a critical foothold Specter has used in the past to disperse billions of dollars to Pennsylvania.

When Supreme Court nomination hearings are held later this summer, Specter will be the last senator to ask questions of the eventual nominee -- a dramatically lower profile than in 2005 and 2006, when he chaired the committee and ran the confirmations of Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr.

Democrats could decide after the 2010 midterms to reward Specter for his move by granting him seniority on committees, but recent precedent has not been kind to such situations. In 2002, for instance, Frank Lautenberg came out of retirement to bail out New Jersey Democrats, agreeing to run in place of the ethically disgraced incumbent, Robert G. Torricelli (D). Lautenberg won a seat that was once thought to be out of reach. But despite his 18 years of prior Senate service, Democrats relegated him to the most junior positions on committees.

Specter, after 43 years as an active Republican, will have to prove his Democratic loyalty over the next 20 months to his colleagues in order to win their support for his seniority. That effort has gotten off to a rocky start following an interview he gave with the New York Times Magazine, to be published this Sunday.

Specter joked about how Norm Coleman could possibly win his legal contest and reclaim his Minnesota Senate seat, assuring there would still be at least one Jewish Republican in the chamber. Specter backtracked from those comments in an interview with Congressional Quarterly today,

"In the swirl of moving from one caucus to another, I have to get used to my new teammates," he told CQ. "I'm ordinarily pretty correct in what I say. I've made a career of being precise. I conclusively misspoke."

By Post Editor |  May 5, 2009; 9:08 PM ET

Powered by ScribeFire.



Monday, May 4, 2009

[Articles of Interest] Obama's trade war & crimes of theft

Obama Cracks Down on Tax Code Play Video ABC News  – Obama Cracks Down on Tax Code

President Barack Obama speaks about tax reform in the Grand Foyer of the White AP – President Barack Obama speaks about tax reform in the Grand Foyer of the White House in Washington, Monday, …

WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama promised sternly on Monday to crack down on companies "that ship jobs overseas" and duck U.S. taxes with offshore havens. It won't be easy. Democrats have been fighting — and losing — this battle since John F. Kennedy made a similar proposal in 1961. Obama's proposal to close tax loopholes was a reliable applause line during the presidential campaign, but it got a lukewarm response Monday from Capitol Hill.

Sen. Max Baucus of Montana, the Democratic chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, said the plan needed further study, even though similar ideas have been around for years.

The president's plan would limit the ability of U.S. companies to defer paying U.S. taxes on overseas profits. At the same time, Obama would step up efforts to go after evaders who abuse offshore tax shelters.

Obama said his plan would raise $210 billion over the next 10 years, though no tax increases would go into effect until 2011. That's an average of $21 billion a year, less than a 2 percent nick in a federal budget deficit that is projected to hit $1.2 trillion in 2010.

Lost revenue isn't the only problem, Obama says. He contends the current system gives companies an incentive to invest overseas rather than creating jobs in the U.S.

"It's a tax code that says you should pay lower taxes if you create a job in Bangalore, India, than if you create one in Buffalo, N.Y.," Obama said Monday.

The business community argues the deferral system helps them compete against foreign companies that pay taxes only in the countries where they generate profits.

The bottom line?

"Nobody should miss the fact that this is about revenue," said Raymond Wiacek, head of the tax practice at the law firm Jones Day. "These companies have the money, and the U.S. government needs the money."

Obama also proposed a package of disclosure and enforcement measures designed to make it harder for financial institutions to help wealthy individuals evade taxes in overseas accounts. Obama said the government is hiring nearly 800 new IRS agents to enforce the tax code.

"I want to see our companies remain the most competitive in the world," Obama said at a White House announcement. "But the way to make sure that happens is not to reward our companies for moving jobs off our shores or transferring profits to overseas tax havens."

Obama's plan would impose billions of dollars in new taxes on many of the nation's largest corporations, including Google, General Electric, Hewlett-Packard, Intel and Johnson & Johnson, tax experts said. But it falls well short of the broad overhaul of the tax system that will probably have to wait until at least next year — after Congress deals with health care and energy.

In exchange for the increased taxes some companies would have to pay, Obama agreed to make permanent a research tax credit that would provide firms about $75 billion in breaks over the next 10 years. The credit currently is to expire at the end of the year.

Obama has widespread support in Congress to crack down on tax evaders who illegally hide assets in tax havens. But he faces stiff opposition — even within his own party — to increasing taxes on the legal transactions of U.S. multinational companies.

"To the extent the president continues on the road of cracking down on tax abuse, he can count on my support," said Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa, the top Republican on the Senate Finance Committee. "But if he's using tax shelters as a stalking horse to raise taxes on corporations at the cost of U.S. jobs, he'll lose me."

A coalition of business groups has already stepped up lobbying efforts to kill attempts to increase taxes on overseas profits, saying it would make American companies less competitive.

"We're talking about American jobs at American companies and their ability to compete overseas," said John J. Castellani, president of the Business Roundtable.

At issue is the way the U.S. taxes the overseas profits of American companies. Under current law, American corporations with subsidiaries in foreign countries can defer paying U.S. taxes on the profits of those subsidiaries until the money is transferred back to this country.

If companies leave the money overseas, where corporate tax rates in most countries are lower than in the U.S., they can avoid American taxes on those profits indefinitely. If the money is brought to the U.S., corporations can subtract foreign taxes already paid.

The U.S. has a top corporate income tax rate of 35 percent, which is among the highest in the developed world. However, most corporate income is taxed at much lower rates because of deductions and credits.

In 2004, large corporations paid an average effective tax rate of 25.2 percent on domestic income, according to a Government Accountability Office report last year. For foreign income, the effective U.S. tax rate was about 4 percent, the report said. That figure does not include taxes paid to foreign countries.

Obama's plan would:

_Prevent companies from writing off domestic expenses that help generate profits abroad — until those profits are returned to the U.S. and subjected to American taxes. For instance, administrative tasks performed in New York for a London office would not be tax deductible in the United States.

_Prohibit companies from receiving foreign tax credits on income that is not subject to U.S. taxes.

_End a provision that lets U.S. companies legally shift income from one foreign subsidiary to another, making the taxes they owe to the United States "disappear."

Former President Kennedy failed to end the tax deferral system in 1961, despite telling Congress the U.S. could no longer afford it. The system also survived overhaul efforts in the 1970s and 1980s.

Rep. Charles Rangel, chairman of the tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee, proposed a similar measure to limit the deductions of U.S. multinationals in 2007. But Rangel, a Democrat from New York, tied his proposal to lowering the overall corporate tax rate.

On Monday, he welcomed Obama's plan.

"For too long, our tax laws have rewarded companies that invest and keep their money overseas and turned a blind eye to the use of tax havens by the wealthy," Rangel said.





Powered by ScribeFire.

[Articles of Interest] Iraq Bombs May Slow U.S. Pullout as Splits Fuel Fresh Violence

By Caroline Alexander and Daniel Williams

May 4 (Bloomberg) -- The recent spate of bombings in Iraq means U.S. officials may have to keep troops there longer than they planned, and Iraqis may have to live with a higher level of violence than they wish.

American military officials say they are now reconsidering plans to withdraw troops from all cities in Iraq by the end of June in the wake of car and suicide bombings that killed 191 people in Baghdad between April 23 and April 29.

And analysts say it is likely that violence will continue to plague many parts of Iraq still beset by insurgency and al- Qaeda terrorism, even if the level doesn’t return to its peak at the height of sectarian violence three years ago.

“What we have now is that we are going back to where things were in 2004,” said Liam Anderson, a professor of political science at Wright State University in Ohio. “This is the way things are going to go, but it is difficult to see a full-scale resumption of the insurgency.”

Persistent violence creates a dilemma for President Barack Obama, who is counting on troop reductions in Iraq to permit him to beef up forces in Afghanistan, where U.S. and NATO troops are fighting al-Qaeda and its Taliban allies. Obama risks overseeing two unresolved wars with inadequate resources devoted to either.

The president has charged the government of Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki with resolving conflicts between Sunni and Shiite Muslims over Sunni integration into the army and police, and between Kurds and Arabs over oil-rich land in the north.

Pressure

“Those are all issues that have not been settled the way they need to be settled,” Obama said in an April 29 press conference. “We’ve provided sufficient time for them to get that work done, but we’ve got to keep the pressure up, not just on the military side but on the diplomatic and development sides as well.”

Data compiled by Washington’s Brookings Institution from U.S. Defense Department reports show that the level of violence remains well below that of two years ago even with the recent attacks.

For example, Iraqi civilian deaths fell to 230 in February from a high of 3,500 in February 2007, then rose slightly to 260 in March, according to Brookings.

“Although you’ve seen some spectacular bombings in Iraq that are a legitimate cause of concern, civilian deaths, incidents of bombings, et cetera, remain very low relative to what was going on last year,” Obama said in the news conference.

Under an agreement struck last year between the Bush administration and the Iraqi government, U.S. forces are to leave cities by June 30 and the entire country by the end of 2011. Obama has said that he will withdraw all but 50,000 U.S. soldiers by Aug. 2010.

Mosul Delay

The agreement allows for the withdrawal schedule to be altered by mutual consent. U.S. officers have pinpointed Mosul as one city where troops might have to remain longer because it is a bastion of a Sunni Muslim insurgency and al-Qaeda, the global terror network led by Osama bin Laden.

“The only city I would consider that might require an extended stay would be Mosul,” General Ray T. Odierno, commander of U.S. forces in Iraq, told the Dubai newspaper Khaleej Times in an interview published April 27.

Col. Gary Volesky, the senior commander in Mosul, said in an April 14 teleconference with Pentagon reporters that the city is “short” 5,000 police needed to occupy neighborhoods cleared of insurgents by combined American and Iraqi raids.

U.S. Troops Out

Some doubts have also been raised about the timing of a pullback from Baghdad, although Odierno told the newspaper that he “felt comfortable” for now with overall security in the capital even after the recent suicide bombings.

“If this continued over a longer period of time then we might have to take that into consideration,” he said.

So far Iraq has shown no public eagerness to delay withdrawals. “We believe that Iraqi security forces are more suited to this fight than foreign troops,” Iraqi national security adviser Mowaffak al-Rubaie said in an April 30 interview.

He acknowledged that the security situation in Baghdad, Mosul and other places is being reviewed and that al-Qaeda hasn’t yet been “eradicated.”

Still, he wants U.S. troops out of Iraq. “There is a clear timetable for the withdrawal of foreign troops and we would like to stick to the letter and spirit of the agreement,” he said, while attending an investment conference in London.

Obama plans to reduce the force in Iraq, currently at 135,000, by 12,000 within six months, Odierno told reporters in Baghdad on March 9.

‘Major Showdown’

Obama will need to keep enough troops in Iraq to exert some control over the situation as power struggles intensify during the course of the U.S. drawdown, Anderson said.

“I don’t see it is disintegrating rapidly, but a slow trend downwards as things become more and more fragmented,” he said. “We are heading for a major showdown for control of the state if the U.S. withdraws.”

Relations between Sunni Muslims and the central government, still dominated by representatives of the country’s Shiite Muslim majority, remain explosive.

Many Sunnis who initially fought the U.S. after the 2003 invasion have allied themselves with American forces against al- Qaeda in the past two years. Those Sunnis viewed al-Qaeda as excessively brutal and the Americans as a counterbalance to Shiite domination, said Stephen Biddle, a senior fellow at New York’s Council on Foreign Relations.

Sunni Signal

Al-Maliki’s government hasn’t kept its pledge to integrate Sunni forces grouped in militias known as the Sons of Iraq and the Awakening Councils into the army and police forces, Biddle said. As a result, he said, some Sunnis now simply look the other way as al-Qaeda launches new attacks.

“The Sunni community shut al-Qaeda down,” Biddle said. “Now they have decided to send a signal about what could happen if the government doesn’t respect its promises and if the U.S. forces leave and abandon the Sunnis.”

A conflict is also looming between Kurds, who make up 20 percent of Iraq’s population, and Sunni Arabs, another 20 percent, over control of oil-rich parts of the north. The Kurds possess their own militia and have expanded control beyond their far northeastern autonomous zone into areas near the cities of Mosul and Kirkuk.

A “heavy U.S. footprint” will be needed in at least Baghdad, Mosul and Kirkuk, which is the hub of northern oil production, said Michael Knights, an analyst at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. “It will take lots of effort to prevent local flare-ups.”

To contact the reporters on this story: Daniel Williams in Cairo at dwilliams41@bloomberg.net; Caroline Alexander in London at calexander1@bloomberg.net.

Last Updated: May 3, 2009 17:48 EDT



Powered by ScribeFire.

Thursday, April 30, 2009

PC Socialism - Swine flu name change? Flu genes spell pig - Government Healthcare??

A farmer wash pigs at a pig farm in Medan, North Sumatra, Indonesia, Thursday, AP – A farmer wash pigs at a pig farm in Medan, North Sumatra, Indonesia, Thursday, April 30, 2009. Indonesia, …

WASHINGTON – No matter what you call it, leading experts say the virus that is scaring the world is pretty much all pig. So while the U.S. government and now the World Health Organization are taking the swine out of "swine flu," the experts who track the genetic heritage of the virus say this: If it is genetically mostly porcine and its parents are pig viruses, it smells like swine flu to them.

Six of the eight genetic segments of this virus strain are purely swine flu and the other two segments are bird and human, but have lived in swine for the past decade, says Dr. Raul Rabadan, a professor of computational biology at Columbia University.

A preliminary analysis shows that the closest genetic parents are swine flu strains from North America and Eurasia, Rabadan wrote in a scientific posting in a European surveillance network.

"Scientifically this is a swine virus," said top virologist Dr. Richard Webby, a researcher at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital in Memphis. Webby is director of the WHO Collaborating Center for Studies on the Ecology of Influenza Viruses in Lower Animals and Birds. He documented the spread a decade ago of one of the parent viruses of this strain in scientific papers.

"It's clearly swine," said Henry Niman, president of Recombinomics, a Pittsburgh company that tracks how viruses evolve. "It's a flu virus from a swine, there's no other name to call it."

Dr. Edwin D. Kilbourne, the father of the 1976 swine flu vaccine and a retired professor at New York Medical College in Valhalla, called the idea of changing the name an "absurd position."

The name swine flu has specific meaning when it comes to stimulating antibodies in the body and shouldn't be tinkered with, said Kilbourne, 88.

That's not what government health officials say.

"We have no idea where it came from," said Michael Shaw, associate director for laboratory science for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. "Everybody's calling it swine flu, but the better term is 'swine-like.' It's like viruses we have seen in pigs, it's not something we know was in pigs."

On Wednesday, U.S. officials not only started calling the virus 2009 H1N1 after two of its genetic markers, but Dr. Anthony Fauci the National Institutes of Health corrected reporters for calling it swine flu. Then on Thursday, the WHO said it would stop using the name swine flu because it was misleading and triggering the slaughter of pigs in some countries.

Another reason the U.S. government wants to ditch the swine label is that many people are afraid to eat pork, hurting the $97 billion U.S. pork industry. Even the experts who point to the swine genetic origins of the virus agree that people can't get the disease from food or handling pork, even raw.

"Calling this swine flu, when to date there has been no connection between animals and humans, has the potential to cause confusion," Chris Novak, chief executive officer of the National Pork Board, said in a news release.

One top flu expert, doesn't like the swine flu name either, but for a different reason. Traditional swine flu doesn't spread easily among people, although this one does now, said Dr. Paul Glezen, a flu epidemiologist at Baylor University.

Columbia's Rabadan said sometimes when he talks to other scientists, he uses the name "swine" or the name "Mexican flu." And that name only adds another case of political incorrectness.

Mexico Health Secretary Jose Angel Cordova said it's wrong to call it "North American flu" and flatly rejects the idea of calling it "Mexican flu." He pointed to WHO information that the swine genes in the virus are from Europe and Asia. Rabadan and others say four of the six pure swine genetic markers are North American.

"I don't think it's fair for someone to blame Mexico for this. You can't blame any country; you can't blame a person or an institution. The recombination of genes in the virus is something that happens naturally," Mexico's chief epidemiologist, Miguel Angel Lezana said Wednesday.

And while the U.S. government and WHO are dropping "swine flu" as the name, someone hasn't told their Webmasters.

On Thursday afternoon, the phrase "swine flu" was still in the Internet addresses for the WHO, Homeland Security and CDC pages on the disease and the question-and-answer page on the U.S. government's pandemic flu Web site.

___

Medical Writers Lauran Neergaard in Washington and Mike Stobbe in Atlanta and reporters Rita Beamish in San Mateo, Calif., and E. Eduardo Castillo in Mexico City contributed to this report.


(Can't wait for government healthcare!!!)





Powered by ScribeFire.