Saturday, May 30, 2009

[Articles of Interest] Barack Obama and the CIA: why does President Pantywaist hate America so badly?

Posted By: Gerald Warner at Apr 24, 2009 at 18:41:00 [General]

If al-Qaeda, the Taliban and the rest of the Looney Tunes brigade want to kick America to death, they had better move in quickly and grab a piece of the action before Barack Obama finishes the job himself. Never in the history of the United States has a president worked so actively against the interests of his own people - not even Jimmy Carter.

Obama's problem is that he does not know who the enemy is. To him, the enemy does not squat in caves in Waziristan, clutching automatic weapons and reciting the more militant verses from the Koran: instead, it sits around at tea parties in Kentucky quoting from the US Constitution. Obama is not at war with terrorists, but with his Republican fellow citizens. He has never abandoned the campaign trail.

That is why he opened Pandora's Box by publishing the Justice Department's legal opinions on waterboarding and other hardline interrogation techniques. He cynically subordinated the national interest to his partisan desire to embarrass the Republicans. Then he had to rush to Langley, Virginia to try to reassure a demoralised CIA that had just discovered the President of the United States was an even more formidable foe than al-Qaeda.

"Don't be discouraged by what's happened the last few weeks," he told intelligence officers. Is he kidding? Thanks to him, al-Qaeda knows the private interrogation techniques available to the US intelligence agencies and can train its operatives to withstand them - or would do so, if they had not already been outlawed.

So, next time a senior al-Qaeda hood is captured, all the CIA can do is ask him nicely if he would care to reveal when a major population centre is due to be hit by a terror spectacular, or which American city is about to be irradiated by a dirty bomb. Your view of this situation will be dictated by one simple criterion: whether or not you watched the people jumping from the twin towers.

Obama promised his CIA audience that nobody would be prosecuted for past actions. That has already been contradicted by leftist groups with a revanchist ambition to put Republicans, headed if possible by Condoleezza Rice, in the dock. Talk about playing party politics with national security. Martin Scheinin, the United Nations special investigator for human rights, claims that senior figures, including former vice president Dick Cheney, could face prosecution overseas. Ponder that - once you have got over the difficulty of locating the United Nations and human rights within the same dimension.

President Pantywaist Obama should have thought twice before sitting down to play poker with Dick Cheney. The former vice president believes documents have been selectively published and that releasing more will prove how effective the interrogation techniques were. Under Dubya's administration, there was no further atrocity on American soil after 9/11.

President Pantywaist's recent world tour, cosying up to all the bad guys, excited the ambitions of America's enemies. Here, they realised, is a sucker they can really take to the cleaners. His only enemies are fellow Americans. Which prompts the question: why does President Pantywaist hate America so badly?


Original Story: http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/gerald_warner/blog/2009/04/24/barack_obama_and_the_cia_why_does_president_pantywaist_hate_America_so_badly



Powered by ScribeFire.

[Articles of Interest] Socialist Morals: Huntsman cautioned for chasing hare under Hunting Act

A
huntsman has been given a police caution for illegally hunting a hare –
the first case of its kind dealt with under the controversial Hunting
Act.




 






Hare. UK: Huntsman cautioned for chasing hare in first case of its kind under Hunting Act

Nigel Bell was filmed chasing a hare by anti-hunt monitors in February this year and has been given a police caution
Photo: GETTY



Nigel Bell, 53, from the Wick and District Beagles, admitted the
breach after he was filmed chasing the animal by anti-hunt monitors in
February this year.

It is the first time anti-hunt campaigners
have successfully brought a case against a hare hunt under the Act
which was introduced in 2004, the League Against Cruel Sports (LACS)
claimed.


Avon and Somerset Police confirmed Bell was cautioned on April 29 at
Thornbury police station in connection with the incident on land
between Horton and Badminton, in South Gloucestershire.

A
spokeswoman for LACS said: "Although a caution may seem like he has
been let off, it is actually a very helpful step forward in our fight
against illegal hunters.

"What this demonstrates is that the
Hunting Act is clear and enforceable and, furthermore, hunters know
this to be the case. It is also apparent that the police are aware of
what the law entails.

"This latest victory has been the result of
the dedication and commitment of League monitors, and under caution it
will be very difficult for Mr Bell to get off lightly on any further
breaches of the Act.

"In light of the fact there currently exists
more than 100 beagle packs, the incident involving Mr Bell will compel
huntsmen next season to adhere to the law."

The Wick and District
Beagles is a relatively small hunting pack that follows beagle hounds
on foot and, pre-ban, traditionally hunted hares rather than foxes or
deer.

Based in South Gloucestershire, outside Bristol, it is
well-known for bringing beagles to various country shows around the
region.

A spokesman for Avon and Somerset Police said: "We have
investigated a couple of allegations of hunting wild animals with dogs,
initially reported in January this year in Horton.

"In connection with that incident, a 53-year-old man was given an adult caution on April 29 at Thornbury police station."


Original Story: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/lawandorder/5291266/Huntsman-cautioned-for-chasing-hare-in-first-case-of-its-kind-under-Hunting-Act.html



Powered by ScribeFire.

[Articles of Interest] Socialist Morals: the PETA Baby Murder contradiction.

Otis Ferry: 'They put me in jail for my beliefs' --- In his first interview since his release, Otis Ferry - the 26-year-old son of Roxy Music star Bryan Ferry - says he was held in prison for four months merely because he supports fox hunting
(What I find ironic is PETA's position on animal right, while supporting baby murder {aka abortion or termination})

By Andrew Alderson
Last Updated: 10:56PM BST 30 May 2009

1 of 4 Images
Otis Ferry with his hunt hounds in Shropshire
Otis Ferry with his hunt hounds in Shropshire: 'I have always been fascinated by the countryside. I love animals more than people.' Photo: Geoff Pugh

OTIS Ferry is back where he is at his happiest: in the countryside surrounded by his five horses, his 60 hunting hounds and his three pet dogs. For the first time since the end of 2007, the man who says he prefers animals to people can relax in the knowledge that he does not have the threat of a lengthy prison sentence hanging over him.

Yet the eldest son of rock star Bryan Ferry and former model Lucy Helmore (now Birley) is in no mood for celebrating. "I don't feel like I have won the Olympic 100 metres title – more like I have survived a two-year marathon," he says.

The dismay of Prisoner RB7994 is not, however, directed at his fellow inmates, most of whom he says he liked, but at the police and Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) which he claims targeted him unfairly. "This has been politically motivated. I am a Tory-supporting master of foxhounds, and the current Government is anti everything that someone like me stands for. This is a socialist Government and I am the epitome of everything they detest.

"The police and Crown Prosecution Service were baying to screw me over as hard as they could. The Gloucestershire constabulary are notorious celebrity-hunters – not that I consider myself a 'celebrity'. I hate the word. The pressure from the Crown Prosecution was not normal. They put an enormous amount of effort and money into a bog-standard case."

It is not just Ferry and his supporters who think he was hard done by. Even the judge who had presided over his case after Ferry was accused of perverting the course of justice could not hide his anger at the defendant's treatment when the charge was dropped.

Ferry is no stranger to controversy, and has been arrested at least five times for his pro-countryside and hunting protests. In 2002, he was seized at 4am as he approached Tony Blair's constituency home "armed" with pro-hunting posters. Two years later, he led a famous assault on the House of Commons chamber when he and seven other pro-hunting protesters disrupted the parliamentary debate.

His latest woes began on November 21 2007 when he had been due to ride out with the South Shropshire Hunt, of which he is joint hunt master. Because his hounds were ill, Ferry called off his own hunt and, along with his girlfriend, Francesca Nimmo, and another huntsman drove to nearby Gloucestershire to ride out with the Heythrop Hunt.

However, he arrived late and was struggling to find the main group when he came across an incident in which a pro-hunt supporter clashed with two hunt monitors – widely known as "antis" or saboteurs to the hunting community.

What exactly happened next is disputed, but Ferry admits that he instinctively went to the aid of the pro-hunt supporter in his scuffle with two women who were seeking to gather evidence of a breach of the Hunting Act 2004.

Ferry, who is dressed in a check shirt and dark blue jeans, admits the hunt supporter had "lost the plot", verbally abusing the hunt monitors, before rocking their car and smashing a window. "I saw the video camera drop to the ground. I thought: 'I had better help this guy out.' I jumped off my horse, ran to the side of the car, picked up the camera and jumped on my horse again. Then I galloped up the road as quickly as I could with the camera gripped in my mouth because my hands were on the reins. I got 200 yards up the road and there was a police car. So I chucked the camera into the verge, opened the gate to a field, and rode off."

One of the hunt monitors claimed, however, that Ferry tried to grab the video camera from her and had won a "tug of war" for her car keys, leaving her upper right arm slightly bruised.

Ferry denies the tussle, but admits he later returned to recover the camera, wiped clear the film, and gave it to a member of the hunt so the camera could be returned to its owner.

Two days later, Ferry was asked to attend Shrewsbury police station after an officer said they had found his lost Jack Russell puppy, Tiny. Yet when he arrived, he was arrested in connection with the Gloucestershire incident, and put in a police cell. Ferry was angry: "Of all the tricks to play. If they had wanted to question or arrest me, all they needed to do was ring me up."

Ferry was taken by police car to Gloucester police station, where he was interviewed and, later, released. In April last year, Ferry was charged with robbery and common assault and a trial date was set for September. Matters then escalated from bad to worse for Ferry, the eldest of four brothers, who was educated at Marlborough College before leaving school after passing 11 GCSEs.

Ferry says he received a mobile message from an anonymous texter just days before the trial, saying that he or she was going to be interviewed by the police. Ferry says he rang the number out of curiosity and found himself speaking to his former groom, David Hodgkiss. He says he was puzzled that Hodgkiss had contacted him, but was unperturbed, especially as the groom had not witnessed the dispute. However, when the police turned up to take the statement, Hodgkiss told them he had been warned by Ferry not to give evidence against him.

Days later, on the first morning of Ferry's robbery and assault trial, Hodgkiss's statement was revealed to the court. The hearing was adjourned until the next day when Ferry was again arrested, this time on suspicion of perverting the course of justice through "witness nobbling". He was interviewed at Stroud police station and, at the insistence of the CPS, refused bail and detained overnight in a police cell. The next day in court, the prosecution lawyer again opposed bail on the grounds that Ferry might re-offend. Judge Martin Picton remanded Ferry in custody, which meant he had to go to Gloucester prison, a Category B institution that houses murders, rapists and violent criminals.

"This really sent a shiver down my spine," says Ferry. "I was handcuffed and booked into this prison with 400 other people. I was absolutely petrified because I had no idea what I might be up against."

Initially, he thought he would be in his single cell for just a night. But the jail was to become his home for the next four months.

In his 12ft-by-7ft cell, he had a bed, sink, lavatory and colour television. "The first week was a blur. I just could not believe that this was happening to me."

His worst moments were changing from his prison uniform – a grey tracksuit – into his suit to go to court expecting to be released on bail, only to be returned to jail: "Going to court to be denied bail is one of the most crushing experiences anyone will ever experience. It happened to me four times and was completely soul-destroying."

After a week in jail, his first visitors were his girlfriend and mother. It was an emotional experience for everyone. "For me, the tears were not about my predicament but how embarrassing it was to be seen in that state: reduced to wearing prison uniform, anchored to a table wearing a prison bib. I felt particularly for my mum, seeing her son totally defensive and helpless. Every part of you is stripped and you become a number, a nothing."

Ferry spent his 26th birthday and Christmas in prison, though he was grateful on Christmas Eve to have a visit from his
63-year-old father, the former lead singer of Roxy Music, whose hits include Dance Away, Avalon and Jealous Guy. "Dad was a bit tougher about it all than mum. I was very touched that he came. I didn't think he would – not out of disloyalty, but because it's a demeaning place to have to come and see your son. If you are in the public eye, you are very image conscious, quite rightly. But I was delighted to see him."

Typically, Ferry spent more than 20 hours a day alone in his cell, reading and writing letters (he had more than 400 from
well-wishers to reply to). Every other evening, one half of the prison block had "association", during which prisoners had the chance to play table tennis or pool. "I have never played with such a bunch of cheats – they were worse than my brothers," he jokes.

Ferry liked most of the "screws" – the prison officers – but complained some were "chippy, unhelpful and lazy". While he was never attacked or threatened, he admits that he benefited from having "Trevor" as his "next-door neighbour". "He was the most feared man in the prison – a black guy, aged about 40, on remand for attempted robbery. He was a colourful character but was very nice to me and a nice person. I got on well with him. Prisons are full of people who have simply made a bad decision at some point in their lives. There was a great feeling of camaraderie. Unless you are a child molester, everyone is seen as an equal."

Ferry found that most prisoners were pro-hunting. "I hope I did a good PR job for the hunting community – and public schoolboys." He says that fellow prisoners offered him drugs – there was an abundance of cannabis and heroin in the jail. It was an offer he found easy to decline.

In January, after four months in jail, Ferry's lawyers persuaded the judge to released him on bail subject to a £25,000 surety, a pledge to live with his mother in west London, and Ferry reporting to the police twice a week. Two months later, the prosecution indicated in court that it was unhappy with witness "inconsistencies" relating to the perverting the course of justice charge against Ferry. This incensed Judge Martin Picton, who described Ferry's custody as "nonsensical and farcical".

Finally, nine days ago, the Crown accepted Ferry's pleas of not guilty to robbery and common assault charges. He admitted a public order offence and was given a one-year conditional discharge for causing "fear, stress and upset" to one of the hunt monitors. He was also fined £350 with £100 costs. Today, he concedes he was responsible for an "error of judgement" and regrets getting involved in the dispute.

Gloucestershire police and the CPS deny targeting Ferry unfairly. "He was treated the same as any other member of the public," says a spokesman. "The decision to investigate alleged offences was made by professional, seasoned officers."

A spokesman for the CPS says: "Mr Ferry's case was kept under review and dealt with according to the Code for Crown Prosecutors, in the same way as every other case that the CPS deals with."

Although Bryan Ferry is worth millions, his eldest son lives a modest existence. Unpaid for his role as hunt master, Otis
lives alone in a two-bedroom cottage, occasionally selling horses, modelling and writing for a living. He drives an ageing green Mercedes estate, and his parents help him out by paying the odd bill.

Ferry is unclear about his future but remains committed to country pursuits. "I love animals more than people," he says. "I have always been fascinated by the countryside." He admires foxes but says hunting is important for conservation, as it picks off the weakest, oldest animals, unlike shooting, which can kill a fox in its prime.

He says the countryside feels "betrayed, victimised and cheated" by the Government, and, as a Conservative supporter, he is now tempted to pursue a career in politics.

"Hunting is like religion in the countryside. I don't think there is anything I could enjoy more than running my hounds and the hunt. The question I now have to answer is whether I feel I have an obligation to other people to try to safeguard rural traditions."


Original Story: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/5412582/Otis-Ferry-They-put-me-in-jail-for-my-beliefs.html



Powered by ScribeFire.

[Articles of Interest] Socialist Morals

We're in a state of sexual confusion! -- The line has blurred between information and tacit encouragement, argues Jenny McCartney.

Jenny McCartney

Last Updated: 3:41PM GMT 28 Mar 2009


Since this Government came to power, one of its most frequently and
piously declared goals has been to reduce the number of teenage
pregnancies.
It has thus poured more than £280 million of taxpayers'
money into contraception services and sex education in the last decade,
not least because it calculates that teenage mothers tend to cost the
state even more after they give birth
.

The latest dismal figures,
however, showed the rate of pregnancy among under-16s at its highest
for 10 years
. The Government responded by vowing a further £20 million
to policies which include long-term contraceptive injections and
implants for teenagers.
It was also suggested last week that abortion
clinics should be allowed to advertise on television
and advertisements
for condoms be routinely screened before the nine o'clock watershed
.
Apart from the inherent distastefulness of such initiatives, there is
little likelihood that they will work
. The Government has taken on the
aspect of a dead-eyed Las Vegas gambler, slumped at the roulette wheel,
throwing good money and principles after bad.


It has been confusedly reported that the suggestion to televise
advertisements for abortion clinics is an effort to "curb teenage
pregnancies". This is not true, since an abortion clinic can only be of
interest when pregnancy has already occurred. It is in fact an effort
to curb live births to teenage mothers.

There is a grotesque and
widening gulf in how society depicts pregnancy in mothers of different
ages and classes
. The pregnancy of an older, middle-class mother – a
triumph over the dreaded spectre of infertility – or a wealthy
celebrity is increasingly viewed by the media as a miraculous event
:
the world is beckoned in to relish vicariously everything from the
first perceptible flutterings of foetal limbs to the gloriously
expanding size of the bump.

If a 14-year-old girl should fall
pregnant, however, sentimental cooing is replaced by cold
functionality
. The official line from the top down is: quick, get the
damn thing "sorted out". If she agrees, the bemused girl is rushed to
the nearest clinic for a termination
(the socialist term for murder), after which she is generally
supposed to shut up about it and hug her shameful little secret close
.
Some girls may bounce back from such an experience with relative
insouciance, others may find that it haunts them psychologically ever
after. Responses to abortion are deep-rooted, complicated and rarely
discussed in public: it's the sorrowful, silent side of sex.

I am
not opposed to the provision of abortion services, sex education or
contraception. I am, however, opposed to the persistent trivialising of
both abortion and sex, particularly with regard to adolescents. The
Government's policy of constant nagging about contraception has not
solved the problem of teenage conception at all: it has made it worse.
The line has been blurred between information and tacit encouragement.

Imagine
that you are a 14-year-old British girl, growing up in a society
saturated in the notion that women should do whatever it takes to make
themselves attractive to men. You acquire a 15-year-old boyfriend whom
you're eager to keep, and he starts pressuring you to have sex. You
feel uneasy, yet sex is precisely what society seems to expect of you.
For years, you've been bombarded with detail on sex, contraception, and
the morning-after pill, and repeatedly informed that there's no need to
feel guilty so long as you're "responsible". You know this, and your
boyfriend does too. But the bottom line is that if you should end up
pregnant, suddenly the easy-going quasi-approval stops: you're still
dumped on your own in a lonely place, outside the abortion clinic or
the antenatal ward.

It's time we stopped telling teenagers lies,
that sex is inherently carefree, contraception infallible, abortion a
casual technical procedure. Yet these are precisely the myths that the
Government's escalating strategy seems designed to promote, at the same
time as effectively dangling early motherhood as a state-subsidised
career option to those with few other prospects. On current form, no
one should be surprised if, 10 years hence, our politicians are still
poring over the teenage pregnancy statistics and wondering where it all
went wrong.


original story: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/jennymccartney/5066636/Were-in-a-state-of-sexual-confusion.html




Powered by ScribeFire.